EDITORIAL TRUST
Useful AI needs a clear editorial process. AuthorEgo keeps your direction, source review, and publishing decisions in that process.
RESEARCH
Supporting sources belong in the review, alongside the draft. Assess whether a source is relevant, whether it supports the claim, and whether the article represents it fairly.
AI research can miss context or make mistakes. Source availability is not a guarantee of accuracy.
EDITORIAL CONTROL
Review and edit prepared articles before approval. Define the Ego’s working direction and choose how much autonomy is appropriate for the publication.
Begin with review-led work. Any automated publishing needs explicit rules and a configured destination.
PUBLISHING
Article publication and newsletter sending are distinct decisions. Check the content, destination, and recipient settings before delivery.
Social expressions are prepared for export; they are not automatically posted to LinkedIn or X.
KNOWLEDGE
Your instructions and accepted knowledge shape future work. Review what you add, choose information you have permission to use, and keep unnecessary confidential details out.
See the privacy policy for data handling, and contact support before sharing information with special requirements.
RESPONSIBLE EXPECTATIONS
AuthorEgo helps prepare the work. A qualified person still needs to decide whether the article is accurate, appropriate, and ready to publish.
We do not promise search rankings, audience growth, revenue, or error-free AI output. For legal, financial, medical, or other consequential material, obtain the appropriate expert review.
For security, privacy, data handling, or procurement questions, contact Antigenic Technologies, Inc. We’ll address your actual requirements.
